Administration announces new appropriate attire policy
Wednesday, 07 October 2009 20:24
smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

In early October, Morehouse College Administration will enact its new “Appropriate Attire Policy.” Based on Dr. Franklin’s conceptualization on the Renaissance Man, specifically his expectation of the “well-dressed” man of Morehouse, the policy will set a campus-wide standard for student’s attire.

The policy outlines 11 expectations pertaining to what students should not wear while on campus. Instead of requiring certain articles of clothing, as a typical dress code would, the policy details those articles of clothing deemed unacceptable for students. Some of the expectations discussed in the policy include to prohibit wearing “sagging” pants, women’s clothing and headwear. The policy will be distributed to students electronically through TigerNet and the school website. The policy will also be outlined in the student handbook and discussed in Crown Forums for students.

While some students disagree with the policy, other students agree with purpose behind the policy.

“I would say that about 95 percent of the students on this campus feel that appearance matters to them,” Dr. William Bynum, vice president of the Office of Student Services, said. “We are not trying to isolate anyone that falls under a category, you can just look at it like it’s one out of 11 things being addressed.”

Dr. Bynum explained that students began voicing concerns to administration about inappropriate attire on campus this semester. Administration partnered with the SGA to work with the student body on creating an attire policy. Some students feel that the anticipated policy lacks proper planning and investigation.

Safe Space, a gay straight alliance student campus organization, has been vocal about the issue.

Safe Space co-president Daniel Edwards said, “Creating this policy was easy and quick. But the energy and effort put into something determines the greater result.”

Some students feel that the policy will not cater to the modern man of Morehouse.

Sophomore student Michael Leonard said, “I understand that the dress code may represent the great leaders of our community from our past who helped change our world through conforming and appearing mainstream with a suit and tie, but let’s not forget about the Spike Lee’s of Morehouse, who are continuing to make great strides through unconventional methods.”

There are many students who question exactly what it means for the Morehouse Man to be “well-dressed.” Does he wear the suit and tie? Does he wear the high-end designer fashions? Or is he of moderate dress, simple and refined?

“The perception of the ‘well-dressed’ man may not be shared by everyone that attends the college,” Leonard explained, “Students should take this pillar, do the necessary work, and apply it to their lives as they see fit.”

Edwards said, “The concept of being well-dressed is a concept of interpretation.” He added, “The five ‘wells’ are character supplements. To build the complete character we should be working on all of them instead of focusing on just one.”

Those students that view attire as a form of self-expression find the policy to be a violation of personal freedoms.

“The very opposite of change is uniformity. Freedom of expression lives at the root of individuality,” Leonard stated.

Some students feel that the standardization of appearance required by the policy will have adverse effects. With attire stipulations students could begin to resort to rebellious forms of self expression.

“Outward appearance assists with how you carry yourself, but either way you cannot change someone’s mindset,” Edwards explained.

Administration hopes that the policy will promote leadership and allow for students to become easily recognizable, a factor that they believe will indirectly assist with campus safety through student identification.

“We see men of Morehouse as leaders and we feel that should be seen in appearance,” Dr. Bynum explained. “This policy will help to set a standard for college students that many other places do not meet, and Morehouse will lead in that.”


Ashlei Williams

Features Editor



Share this article
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! MySpace! Newsvine! Yahoo! Squidoo!
 

Comments  

 
-1 # FAMU Student 2009-10-09 16:10
Cue the lawsuits. Apparently your students $$$ is good enough but not their individuality. We'll see how this goes when the ACLU gets involved.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1 # Preacher Boy 2009-10-09 16:28
Morehouse leading the charge on turning black men into corporate robotic WASP's.

Let's all do our best to imitate White Anglo Saxon Puritans!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # Alan F 2009-10-16 12:46
Sagging pants came from inmates not being allowed to wear a belt.

Grillz denote street life and materialsim. The chase for the almighty dollar.

Wearing women's clothing promotes effeminate behavior.

Tell me, Preacher Boy, what you you like a black man to become by imitating these fashions?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # Delta Girl 2009-10-14 09:53
I personally do not see naything wrong with it. I HATE or should I say DESPISE seeing men walking around with their pants sagging below their behinds and unable to walk properly. That has nothing to do with making them "look White". It's more about making them "look RIGHT". Who is respecting you when you look like that? Certainly not me.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Betty Childs 2009-10-14 10:38
I think anybody telling me how to dress is fascist, bans foster resentment and rebellion, in this case Morehouse is a private university so it's their way or no way.

Way back when, Morehouse men wore dress shirts, slacks and loafers to class and official functions. They removed their hats in the presence of a lady, I like that. Students should wear what they like on their own time.

The extra bit about women's clothing has an air of homophobia.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Cameron C. 2009-10-16 09:07
I totally agree!!!! This is MOREHOUSE, not YOUR HOUSE!!! When u want something bad enough, you will do what needs to be done obtain that very thing. CHANGE for the BETTER is good.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # Alan F 2009-10-16 12:39
I disagree - it is not homophobic. Name any place of business, any profession, where it is acceptable for a man to wear women's clothes. Not very many...

Also, you must think about the impression you are making on future Morehouse Men.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Bey 2009-10-15 10:52
Hello responsible adulthood.
Goodbye street nigger mentality.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Cameron C. 2009-10-16 09:03
Honestly, i can understand both sides of the story.

The students are in class from day to day getting their education; they should be free to get that very education in their OWN comfort. Now, when attending certain activities- sagging pants should not be allowed. No one will take a person wearing sagging pants seriously!! DRESS how you would like to be ADDRESSED!!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # B. Jones 2009-10-16 09:33
it's a question of appropriateness - a slight modification of what's acceptable. I believe the brothers on campus will be more likely to 'modify' how they dress and in the long run will be better for it. Some of the comments I've seen look at this in extreme terms. We're not talking about uniforms, where any form of expression or style is nullified by the strict code of shirt, tie, and jacket. It's about the transition from boy to man, and understanding that outward appearance does matter. It can be a simple lesson, one that some are sure to embrace and others will leave behind once they leave Morehouse. In the end, I believe the positives outweigh the negatives.

-B. Jones
Morehouse '04
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Alan F 2009-10-16 12:35
Where, except in a beauty salon or a comedy routine have you seen a grown man wearing women's clothing? As a student, do you want to bring Thug Life to your institution to higher learning or do you want to bring higher learning to the the thug living the life? The policy does not restrict your individuality - you can always wear your pumps in you room or at parties off campus. What the policy does is codify an unwritten yet acknowledged policy of appropriate dress and attire on campus which a private institution of higher learning, just like a private corporation, club, or organization has the freedom to pursue. Stop making excuses and follow the policy if you wish to continue your path as a Morehouse Man. It is YOUR CHOICE.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Parent of a Man of Morehouse 2009-10-17 09:44
This policy is long overdue. As a mother of a future Morehouse Man it sickens me to walk the grounds of the campus and see young men looking like wannabe thugs and those who want to appear more feminine than some women. This is a private institution and PRIVATE institutions have the right to implement rules such as this one. Those who have a problem with are free to leave and find another school willing to tolerate their extreme scenes. Good riddance sagging pants AND cross dressing!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Relax And Aspire 2009-10-17 16:26
As a former student I am lost as to how an appropriate attire policy addresses the main problems of the campus, such as adequate housing, neighborhood violence, financial aid difficulties of the students, and low morale before and after the 5+ years it takes to graduate.

Does clothing really make an impact on an adult's ability to learn? Is this a step in the right direction or a red herring? I do not see how this makes the school a better place, only more ambiguous towards the administration's power over students.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 09Alumer 2009-10-20 07:46
The issue is that we can't expect sponsors and community partners to come on-campus want to help us and give us money when it doesn't even look like we are going to class. I know that I felt ashamed when the likes of Eric Holder and Desmond Tutu walked our campus and saw dudes "chillin" on Brown St. with their drawers hanging out the back of their pants and du rags on. It really is disrespectful to them because for them it's like "I'm vesting my time, money, and energy toward some kids that look they just belong on the street or in some ridiculous music video."

People are so focused on being seen and acting cool that it takes them 5+ years to graduate. Perhaps if they saved some of that energy then they'd finish on time like me and 90% of my friends did this year.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh